Modelling Ordinary Natural LanguageI have developed a strong interest for questions related to the computational modelling of unrestricted, ordinary natural language, and for the constraint-based approaches in particular. Natural language must be taken here in its ordinary, common-sense notion (...) under which we can say that The Times in the UK, The New York Times in the USA, The Sydney Morning Herald in Australia, and other newspapers around the world, all publish in the same language --- though of course we would not deny that there may be local differences concerning which expressions are judged grammatical by the relevant editors. (Pullum and Scholtz, 2001)This ordinary, common-sense notion covers grammatical utterances, as well as utterances that are grammatically imperfect, not completeley well formed, or grammatical to different degrees. Being able to represent, process and reason about ordinary language present all sorts of theoretical and practical challenges. Model-Theoretic Syntactic ParsingMTS offers a radically different conception of what constitutes the syntactic description of an utterance than traditional Generative-Enumerative Syntax (GES). It was argued in several occasions in the literature that MTS is much better suited than GES for describing ordinary language---especially linguistic phenomena such as fragments, graded grammaticality, lexical openness, ... Yet, and despite that feature, MTS parsing has been poorly studied.
Different works showed that MTS parsing can be conceived as a Applications for Language TechnologyModel-theoretic, constraint-based parsing opens new perspectives for applications to grammar checking, language learning, and robust parsing more generally. |
Please send comments or queries about this web site to jpprost@ics.mq.edu.au
|